has a new set of political lies that he can't back
up with proof.
sounds a bit unpatriotic
like to start off by saying that I think Bruce Springsteen is one of the
greatest Rock artists of all time. His music is brilliant, and he
is a magnificent performer. I
have been one of his biggest fans for over 30 years.
A few years ago,
before the 2004 Presidential election, Bruce
Springsteen made some very unsettling political
comments. Because of his outright political lies (not opinions) I
wrote a web page about him:
Now it's 2007
and Bruce has
a new album, it's a new political season, and Bruce
has a new set of lies.
I want to first
start off by saying that Bruce Springsteen
has every right to express his opinion. I would never
want to take that right away from him, or any other American, EVER.
But if Bruce
is going to spew lies, without evidence, I'm going to call him on it.
writing this web page because I disagree with him, I'm writing it because
he's spreading lies that he cannot prove.
has a new album out called "Magic".
It's a pretty good record overall even if some of the lyrics are a bit
But I'd like to
ask Bruce why
did he choose the photo on the cover of this album that makes him look
like a criminal in a police mug shot?
With all the great
concert photos of him why is he using picture that makes him look like
Nolte after a DUI or a drug bust? And why doesn't
he ever put his great E Street Band
on his album covers with him? You've sure got a guilty look there
is suffering from a disease called "Bush Derangement
Syndrome" where people spread and believe
lies about President Bush
simply because they hate him so much.
People who have
this disease start with the template that they hate George
Bush first, and then fit in all their false
"facts" after that. It seems to me that is exactly what Bruce
Springsteen is doing.
Bruce is drinking
the Far Left Wing's, Koz and Move On Kool Aid. Spreading their viscous
lies that they can't back up with facts.
28, 2007 Bruce
and the E Street Band
appeared on the "Today Show".
While their performance
wasn't too bad, I first have to say that Bruce
didn't look very good.
His hair was all
over the place, and he looked like he had just been released from jail
after a night in the drunk tank. I don't understand why he didn't
look a bit more polished.
He also looked
very unhappy and angry like he didn't want to be there very unlike his
Today Show performance of 2002.
He pretty much
begged people to buy his new album, maybe because his album sales are down
because many people don't like his current political lies.
During his performance
he made some very nasty, untrue political statements about President
Rather than me
taking his comments out of context, you should take a look at exactly what
he said in this clip.
"Over the past
six years we've had to add to the American picture rendition, illegal wiretapping,
voter suppression, and no Habeas Corpus to the neglect of our great city
of New Orleans and her people. An attack on the Constitution, and the loss
of our best men and women in a tragic war."
On the 60 Minutes
television show Bruce Springsteen
again made some very harsh accusations against his country.
By the way Bruce,
we're not calling you unpatriotic because of your right to protest which
is perfectly valid. But we are saying you ARE
unpatriotic if you make these unfounded charges and refuse to offer up
any proof of them.
played Bruce's Today
Show comments and asked him to provide specific examples of the accusations
that he made.
played asked the question is Bruce's
protests legitimate political dissent, or simply baseless accusations?
comments from 60 Minutes,
and asked Bruce
very basic questions such as where is the proof?
Here to see the Bill O'Reilly $25,000.00
charity challenge for Bruce Springsteen
to answer his accusations with proof. Actually all
stipulated was that Springsteen
had to do was show up to get the charity money.
I do understand
that Bruce is
on tour and may not have time to visit O'Reilly,
but don't you think he could have set up a future interview?
not go in and offer ANY
of his accusations O'Reilly
up some new comments. Click
Here to see them.
when you bash America,
and make very serious accusations against your country, you have a RESPONSIBILITY
to back them up with proof!
be able to offer this proof if you make these charges, and if you did so
you would gain back your respect, and send $25,000.00
to a well deserved charity.
rudely calls CNN reporter Soledad O'Brien
an IDIOT to her
was simply asking what Bruce
thought about those who question musicians who take political stand.
She did not condemn
him for that, she simply asked him the question at which point Bruce
called her an IDIOT!
if you're going to make serious allegations, as a high profile person,
which is perfectly fine by me, you should be responsible enough to stand
up to questioning about them.
If you're not,
then SHUT UP AND SING!
This clip is important
in the fact that it shows you how uncomfortable Bruce
is in being questioned about his politics. He goes on to say that removing
Bush is simply common sense and not a political
The stock market today is DOUBLE
where it was when Bill Clinton
was in office. So I guess it only makes sense to remove the man who
gave all Americans
who work tax cuts to help make that happen. Moron!
He mentions the
"circumstantial" evidence in a "rush" to war.
The evidence was
overwhelming that Saddam Hussien
either had or was compiling nuclear weaponry and that fact has been proven
that most of the media has constantly tried to spin it the other way.
We also know he had chemical weapons as he had used them against his own
The "rush" to
war took 12 years Bruce.
Where were you? That's the length of time Saddam
ignored the 17 UN sanctions against him. But I'm not going to go
over all these points again. I've discussed them all on my other page about
you, and people can read all about the evidence there:
go over all the new claims (lies) that
Springsteen has made:
and no Habeas Corpus?
says there has been Rendition
and no Habeas Corpus. Really?
To whom is he referring to?
Can he name a
that has had his rights violated by being held in a jail without the due
process of law?
Or is he maybe
speaking of those non-military combatants, those TERRORISTS,
those non-Geneva Convention following thugs, those NON
AMERICANS, those women and child killing MURDERERS
on the battlefields of Afghanistan
I'm going to assume
that's who he meant until he explains himself further.
are people who have declared war upon America
and are not following the rules of engagement as outlined by the Geneva
They don't wear
uniforms, they don't represent any country's government and they are NOT
AMERICANS. Because of that,
we as AMERICANS
do NOT have to
afford them the luxury of Habeas Corpus.
want to offer these people who are actively killing our soldiers, and I
might add, innocent women and children, our AMERICAN
I'm sorry, I'm
one of the great AMERICANS
who do not believe these scum deserve ANY
of our rights because they are NOT Americans. They are simply
insane terrorists killing innocent people randomly. They are roaches,
they are snakes, and quite honestly in my opinion they should be not even
be held as prisoners, they should be killed on the battlefield in cold
value they hold for me, a great American,
is the intelligence value they may have to catch and kill even more of
For the record
Bush's suspension of Habeas
for the FOREIGN PRISONERS captured
on battlefields outside of the United States,
was approved by Congress
through the Military Commissions Act.
it's not President Bush's
suspension of Habeas Corpus,
who approved this act.
The Military Commissions
Act of 2006, signed by President
Bush, that was approved by Congress,
including many Democrats,
stipulates that the right of habeas corpus should be denied ONLY
to ALIENS detained
by the United States,
and NOT United
Lawyers for the
TERRORISTS captured on battlefields OUTSIDE
of the United States
brought their case to the United States Supreme Court In December 2007.
Justice Antonin Scalia had just ONE
question for the lawyers which they could NOT
answer (just like you can't Bruce):
asked: "Do you have
a single case, in the 220 years of our country -- or, for that matter,
in the five centuries of the English Empire -- in which habeas was granted
to an alien in a territory that was not under the sovereign control of
either the United States or England?
In 220 years of
our history, or five centuries of the British, do you have a single case
in which it was not a citizen of England or a citizen of the United States
in which a common law writ of habeas corpus issued to a piece of land that
was not within the sovereign jurisdiction? You are appealing to a common
law right that somehow found its way into our Constitution without -- as
far as I can discern -- a single case, a writ ever issued to a non citizen."
while you cry about our Constitution being
trampled on the simple fact is that it is the TERRORISTS
and their leftist lawyers who want to trample on it.
The same assertions
you made were brought to the Supreme Court,
the same way you presented them, WITH NO PROOF!!!
these four men, ALL
convicted terrorists? ALL
of them got fair trials.
an illegal enemy combatant ant is a terrorist held here in the US and he
was given a fair trial by law. He was was found guilty of all charges against
him on August 16, 2007 by a federal jury, which found that he conspired
to kill people in an overseas Jihad and to fund and support overseas terrorism.
the convicted failed airplane shoe bomber, was given a fair trial by jury. Zacarias Moussaoui,
who is NOT an
American citizen, but was also given a fair trial and who was also convicted,
says that he and Reid
were meant to hijack the 5th plane on 9/11 and had intended to fly it into
the White House.
John Walker Lindh
got a plea bargain deal even though he conspired with Al
Quaeda and supplied his services to the Taliban.
That makes him a TRAITOR
who committed TREASON
against the United States
could have been put to death for his crimes.
All four of these
convicted terrorists, one of whom is not even an American citizen, were
given fair trials.
So what the heck
is Bruce Springsteen
taking about? He ought to explain
himself but he seems to have no interest in that, or offering up
any evidence to back up his claims.
In fact if anything
we are giving enemy combatants rights they do not deserve in the war on
is also claiming that President Bush
has authorized illegal wiretapping. Really? Then why is it
in the last six years that no charges have been brought against him for
doing so? Congress has
accused the President of these wiretaps but have produced no real evidence
against him. The wiretaps
that have happened are of people speaking to known
terrorists in other countries, NOT
citizens here in the United States. And these wiretaps
were ALL known to the ranking members of Congress.
of wiretaps, lets talk about the last administration.
It was Bill
Clinton who illegally used the Echelon
program in which he allowed the National Security
Administration to wiretap and spy on American
citizens all throughout the 1990's.
It was Bill
Clinton who had the NSA
of personal American
phone calls, e-mails, faxes, and ATM transactions inside the United
States - ALL WITHOUT A
It also seems
that Bill Clinton
not just to spy on potential terrorists. Evidence exists
that he actually used it for political purposes. Bill Clinton actually
wiretaps to spy for him and help him win the 1996 Presidential election!
York Times said "ECHELON
is also being used for purposes well outside its original mission. The
regular discovery of domestic surveillance targeted at American civilians
for reasons of 'unpopular' political affiliations
or for no probable cause at all".
a left wing group that supports the Democratic
Party, committed the greatest voter fraud
employees have been accused of, and have plead guilty to illegal elections
practices in Ohio, New Mexico, Florida, Colorado, Minnesota, Pennsylvania,
Wisconsin, and Virginia.
freely admitted they forged voter registration forms. According to prosecutors,
workers admitted filling out registration forms with names they found in
phone books last October (2004).
Read the ACORN
where they ADMIT
The Liberal New
York Times stated that "A five month study
for the Democratic National Committee found that more than one in four
Ohio voters experienced problems at the polls last fall, but the study
evidence of widespread election fraud that might have contributed to President
Bush's narrow victory there."
2006, four employees of the DemocraticJohn
Kerry Presidential campaign, the sons of a
first term congresswoman, Democratic Representative
Gwen Moore, and Milwaukee's former acting
Pratt, were among five Democratic
activists convicted of the crime of slashing the tires of 27 vehicles rented
to drive voters and monitor to the polls on Election Day.
It's also interesting
to note that most Democrats like
Clinton OPPOSE having
voters show a photo ID before they can vote which would greatly help prevent
voter fraud so illegal aliens and other ineligible people don't undermine
the integrity of the election process.
Is your Senator
one of the ones who opposed this bill? Not a SINGLE
Democrat voted for this bill! Barrack Obama
didn't even show up to vote!
has also stated that convicted felons be given back the right to vote. I wonder why
that is? In 2000 an estimated 10,000 felons voted illegally in Florida.
When their voter registration was checked, 85 percent of these convicted
felons were registered as Democrats.
Hillary has a
very nice constituency. Evidence has been found that in In 2000,
Democratic officials reportedly mailed absentee voter applications and
a welcoming form letter from Democratic President Bill
Clinton to California immigrants with legal
Green Cards even though these people were clearly not yet citizens.
Now the Democrats
in an attempt to thwart this problem are voting all over the nation to
give illegal aliens drives licensees although there is NO requirement for
them to have car insurance.
That will allow
illegal aliens to be automatically registered
to vote because the "motor voter"
program which automatically
registers people to vote when they get an election.
How low will the
Democrats go to try and steal an election?
You want to keep
talking about voter suppression Bruce? I could write
an entire book on Democratic voting irregularities but I'll drop the issue
here with just one last point:
This is the way
the 2004 election played out. It's time for
you liberals to get over it. This is the way AMERICA
wants it! Red
= Bush Kerry
USA Today, November 5, 2004.
I'd say your side
was a little outnumbered! But instead of
accepting the results you call it voter suppression.
to a Liberal
is requiring voters to have a picture ID. Voter Suppression
to a Liberal is
not allowing convicted felons vote. Voter Suppression
to a Liberal
is not allowing illegal aliens to vote. Voter Suppression
to a Liberal
not providing a car for every Democrat who wants to vote. Voter Suppression
to a Liberal is
not allowing Democrats to vote more than once on Election Day. Voter Suppression
to a Liberal
is what they claim EVERY TIME
they loose an election! Voter Suppression
to a liberal is ALLOWING our military personnel to vote!
Very simply Bruce,
when and where? It's hard to answer your allegations of this when
you simply spit out one word, without citing a single incident, or make
any other statements about it.
torture? My one word answer to your one word allegation is NO!
you refuse to cite a SINGLE
example or ANY
proof whatsoever. But as with ALL your
other allegations you never seem to offer up any proof. You were
on the 60 Minutes TV Show,
and you gave no examples, you've been touring all over the world, and you
gave no examples, you've had countless press interviews, and you gave no
DECEITFUL, AND DISINGENUOUS for you to spout
all these allegations you make and not issue so much as a SHRED
(Yep, that's my name!) of proof. The burden is on YOU
to prove them if YOU
make such allegations.
So I'll have to
tell you Bruce,
I'm VERY angry
at you over this claim you've made. You're accusing our President
of torture, because you've mentioned this administration specifically,
yet you've offered up NO PROOF
whatsoever. Bearing false witness against your brother is a major
sin, and you'll be held accountable for that.
is torture and murder, and it was sanctioned by Saddam
Bush hasn't cut out any tongues. He
also hasn't GASSED
his own countries children
to DEATH with
chemical weapons. His soldiers haven't assassinated their own troops.
His offspring haven't personally raped and beaten people to death.
He hasn't thrown people off of buildings as punishment.
IS YOUR FREAKING PROOF???!!!!!!!
some torture PROOF
for you Bruce; (Show me yours)
gassed to death by Saddam Hussien.
tortures, punishments and executions, were routine in Iraq during Saddam
Hussein's rule of power: Beatings, Crucifixions,
Hammering nails into the fingers and hands, Amputating sex organs or breasts
with an electric carving knife, Spraying insecticides into a victim's
eyes, Branding with a hot iron, Committing rape while the victim's
spouse is forced to watch, Medical experimentation's, Pouring boiling
water into the victim's rectum, Nailing the tongue to a wooden board, Extracting
teeth with pliers, Using bees and scorpions to sting naked children in
front of their parents, and tying ropes to vehicles and posts to rip off
their limbs. Uday Hussein
would personally dip children's feet into acid, and burning them complexity
off, before he began questioning the parents so that they
would be more compliant to talk. That was just the beginning of
his torture sessions that would go on for hours and end in maimings and
particularly cruel form of torture that Saddam Hussien
used quite often.
This video shows
how he had prisoners thrown off the tops of buildings, one after another,
to punish them.
this video is very graphic and disturbing!
The building tossings
are really cruel because they cause server permanent damage, yet in most
cases it's not enough to kill the victims. Some of these people were
then beaten in public after the tossings and then thrown into jails were
they received little or no medical treatment and suffered for years in
immense pain. Compare this to the Liberals
favorite demon of so called torture, waterboarding, where the entire situation
is over in just a few minutes and no permanent damage occurs to the individual.
I have a lot more videos like this including bloody tongue cuttings and
beheadings, but I think I've made my point. But here is something
you should think about when you specifically accuse President
Bush of torture. Liberals
claim that "waterboarding" is torture and that President
Bush is as bad as "Hitler,
Stalin, and Pol Pot" (said by Democratic
Dick Durbin on the Senate floor).
30 briefings in 2002 by the CIA, Democrats,
including Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi
and Jay Rockefeller,
were given virtual tours of the CIA's overseas detention sites, and were
told about these methods of interrogation and their response was;
these methods tough enough"!
Referring to waterboarding,
a practice that years later would be condemned as torture by Democrats on Capitol Hill,
objections were raised by the panel. Instead, at least two lawmakers
in the room asked the CIA to "push harder",
two U.S. officials said. Part of this was because the military has
never been allowed to perform waterboarding. These Congress people
wondered if it would be better if they should be.
Porter J. Goss (R-FL) was a party to the briefings. "Among those
being briefed, there was a pretty full understanding of what the CIA was
doing," said Goss,
who chaired the House intelligence committee from 1997 to 2004 and then
served as CIA director from 2004 to 2006. "And
the reaction in the room was not just approval,
So if this method
of waterboarding is deemed as torture, and thus illegal, will Democratic
Representatives Nancy Pelosi
and Jay Rockefeller
be brought up on charges for being a party to it? Are they are
war criminals like Bush
and Cheney have
Will they be criminally
investigated by a special counsel and be brought in to testify before Congress?
Will they be sentenced to jail time?!!!
Notice what else
Pelosi knew about: The CIA's so called black
sites where terrorists were being held overseas. And she did NOT
Of the only three
cases of waterboarding reported, one was against 9/11 plotter and terrorist
He was reported
to have been waterboarded for just 2 minutes
before he "broke" and confessed to plotting 9/11 and giving up the names
of other terrorists and plans, which turned out to be true.
lives in an air conditioned jail and gets 3 meals a day.
I've gotten more water in my mouth in the surf at Asbury
Park than Kalid
Sheik Mohammed did on the day he was waterboarded!
bet you have too!
We became aware
Kalid Sheik Mohammed.
from this man, Abu Zubayda,
a close ranking associate of Osama bin Laden.
He was captured after a fire fight in Pakistan
where our intelligence officials wiretapped his phone.
He was being held
at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba where
he was interrogated for approximately 2 months during which time he gave
up no intelligence information. Since we knew
for sure from the LEGAL
wiretaps that he was a high ranking al Qaeda
official, our troops decided there might be a better way to interrogate
He was waterboarded.
After just 35 seconds he gave up the name and location of Kalid
Sheik Mohammed. THIRTY
Thirty Five seconds.
That's all it took for this piece of human waste to talk. Now this
man also now lives in air conditioned comfort getting three meals a day
which are better than what the guards get! The fact of the matter
is that the time for all of our waterboarding put together has lasted less
than 4 and one half minutes, and it has only been done to THREE
But to this Liberals
They claim that the US
is a torture nation and that President Bush
is a war criminal for it. It's simply ridiculous.
is an interrogation method, NOT
torture. Torture is using beatings, blow torches, pliers, chains, and many
other sadistic methods on people for hours and hours, even days, weeks,
and, yes, years which happened to our soldiers in Vietnam such as Senator
John McCain. Torture many
times leaves the individual with permanent physical damage. Waterboarding
for hours, especially on someone who doesn't know anything, doesn't work
and it's cruel and inhumane. But waterboarding someone for just a
few minutes, of whom we know we have very good intelligence on, through
legal methods such as overseas wiretaps works VERY
personnel know that if someone doesn't give up any information in just
a few minutes of waterboarding that they must knot know very much. Waterboarding
someone for hours isn't going to work. It's going to kill them.
And unlike a beating which can be endured waterboarding seems to produce
some pretty good results in a remarkably short period of time.
I'll venture to
say that if YOU'RE
going to call it torture, and I'M not
willing to call it that, but if YOU are,
that it is the MOST humane
form of torture used. That's because it doesn't kill or maim a person,
it doesn't leave permanent damage, and the whole thing is over in just
a few minutes.
It leaves those
to live out their lives on the taxpayer dime gaining weight as they have,
in a nice comfortable prison cell.
Let's also point
out one other important fact. Waterboarding of prisoners has never happened
in the United States
itself, and it has never happened to an American
citizen. Yep, it's only those non-military combatants, those TERRORISTS,
those non-Geneva Convention
following thugs, those NON AMERICANS,
those women and child killing MURDERERS
on the battlefields of Afghanistan
and Iraq I mentioned
ONLY approved wiretaps of those people calling overseas who have some type
of known terrorist activity. What Liberals
don't want you to know, and is rarely reported in the media, is that President
Bush has stopped DOZENS
of major attacks on the United States
with this type of intelligence gathering.
I'm not going
to be sorry if one or two gallons of water, or if listening to an overseas
phone call is going to stop another series of 9/11
attacks against America. I'm not going
to apologize for it, I'm not going to feel bad about it, and I am PROUD
that we have a man in office like George Bush
knows how to prevent these attacks from happening again.
If it's going
to stop something like this from happening again, I'm all for it.
So are MOST Americans.
The next time
around the World Trade Center
attacks will seem like child's play. That's because
the the terrorists are actively seeking nuclear weapons and we know it.
The president of Iran, al Qaeda, and
many other would just love to see a mushroom cloud over the United
you can continue to spout out your one word of protest, "torture"
like a spoiled little kid. We all know what your referring to.
But most of us don't think of a couple of gallons of water as torture ESPECIALLY
it's going to prevent something like this from happening.
THE #@%! UP!
The only waterboarding
being performed in the United States
is being performed by the military, to it's own Special Operations soldiers,
willingly, to learn how to resist interrogations.
Oh yeah, there
group of people who are waterboarding people in America
over and over again.
It's those wacko
anti war kooks who are waterboarding each other!
babe is pretty tough!
Compare that to
the "building tossings" shown above that cause
permanent severe physical damage, not just 2 minutes of being uncomfortable.
Didn't these people
just commit a crime by waterboarding this man?!!! Call Dick
Cheney now! IDIOTS!
Here to watch these wackos waterboard each other!
since you only mentioned one word "torture",
and never explained yourself, none of us really know what the heck
you are talking about. But that's how you Drive
by Liberals operate. You people make
accusations, with no evidence, and just keep on screaming things like
Lied, Kids Died" spinning in a circle like
spoiled little kids until you pass out from exhaustion and need a nappy.
There's a lesson
to be learned about Liberals
from this, and we learned it from the Clinton
Hate Machine who mastered it. With Liberals
it's the seriousness of the charge that's all important, NOT
I produced my evidence with facts, now where's yours? Coward.
I'll agree there
torture going on in America.
It's having to listen to the gang of idiots, Hillary Clinton,
John Edwards, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and Ted "The Swimmer" Kennedy's
inane comments on a daily basis!
Best Men and Women"
In your statement
on the Today
show you mentioned "the loss of our best men
and women in a tragic war." Do
you really believe that Bruce?
Because in the
2004 Presidential campaign you strongly supported John
Kerry. Here you describe Senator
John Kerry as being able to give America a
and responsible foreign policy".
Here to see Bruce's statement. Listen
closely to John Kerry's "sane and responsible
foreign policy". Senator
Kerry seems a bit confused to me! Click
Here to hear this clip.
See the many positions
Kerry took on Iraq.
said: "You know, education,
if you make the most of it, if you study hard and you do your homework,
and you make an effort to be smart, uh, you, you can do well. If you don't,
you get stuck in Iraq.”
Here to see John Kerry
basically call American
It doesn't sound
like John Kerry
thinks we sent our best men and women to Iraq. It makes them
sound like they are stupid and that the Army was the only choice for them.
made that statement the troops made a nice little sign for him.
Let's not forget
that EVERY American
soldier is a volunteer.
also claims that American troops are TERRORIZING
the women and children of Iraq. He makes this
statement without any proof then tops it off with an even more inane statement: "Iraqi's should
be doing that" Meaning Iraqi's
should be terrorizing people!
when you start supporting Hillary Clinton
for President in 2008 I'll be showing the clips of all her flip flops also!
Neglect of our Great City of New Orleans"
Bruce, I'm going
to have to admit that you're right again. Darn!
New Orleans WAS
a neglected city. That's right, it was neglected by the Democrats
you support and the wacko environmentalists.
was an act of God. George Bush
did not cause that, despite what some nuts have claimed.
The levee's in
Orleans didn't have to break.
But they did, and the aftermath was a disaster. Why?
It was the Democratic
Envirowackos sued the Army
Corps of Engineers (and won) to PREVENT
the levee's in
New Orleans from
being reinforced, are the ones who are now screaming that George
Bush doesn't care about poor people.
They claim they sued to preserve the wetlands. They did that and turned
of New Orleans
Back in 1974,
the stalwart guardians of the environment at Save
Our Wetlands filed suit and stopped a congressionally
funded plan to protect New Orleans
with a hurricane barrier. There used to be a link on their web site
saying how they were proud of this action, but it's been mysteriously removed
now that it's apparent that it was their actions that caused New
Orleans to flood.
But it was the
sheer incompetence of Louisiana's Democratic
politicians that made things horribly worse before and after the disaster.
a call from President Bush,
telling him there was a very good chance the levee's would break, New
Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin ordered his people
to the Superdome!
was advised to evacuate his citizens, and had the means to do so with thousands
of school busses, but instead he put them right in harms way.
Mayor Nagin IGNORED
the city's own evacuation plans the responsibilities listed therein.
Orleans evacuation plan MANDATED
that ALL people LEAVE
the city and that the city was responsible for busing all those people
out. The evacuation plan, available online, stated that the city would
definitely flood during a category 3 hurricane and that NO
ONE should remain in the city. Provisions
were provided to bus anyone out who could not afford to leave, and the
mayor had at least 500-2000 buses at his disposal to move the people out
of the danger zone.
Here are pictures
of just some of the many school busses Mayor
Nagin could have used to evacuate his people
with. Not only did he allow all these busses to be ruined, he ordered his
people to the CENTER
of the disaster!
of the state is the one who calls in the National Guard, NOT
In fact it is
THE LAW for a President
to order troops into a state without the permission of that state's governor
under the Posse
Comitatus Act of 1878.
is the one you should blame for the "neglect".
It took 3 days
for the incompetent governor of Louisiana, Governor
Blanco to call out the National
She's the one
who left thousands of people starving and dying for days,
Cross says on its web site that Governor
them NOT to bring
food to the starving people at the Superdome
even though they had more than enough supplies nearby.
They said she
told them that she did not want to "create
a magnet for more people to come to the Superdome".
So Mayor Nagin
ordered the people to the Superdome,
and Governor Blanco
refused to let the food and supplies get to them. Nice teamwork by
Instead of accepting
Bush's offer for help, Governor Blanco
inexplicably called the FORMER, IMPEACHED
President, Bill Clinton, and
asked him what to do!
She then called
to FORMER head
of FEMA under
Clinton, James DeWitt
and asked him what to do!
One can only hope
that Clinton's response
was "Stop being such
a moron and accept the Presidents help!"
There's tons more
I could say about New Orleans
including the misappropriations of funds by the Democrats
from the BILLIONS
of dollars of aid that President Bush
sent down there.
How come Mississippi,
and Florida didn't
have the same problems as Louisiana
The answer is
with the Democrats of Louisiana
ran one of the most corrupt states in the nation for a half a century,
and from them preventing the levee's to be built. Those things combined
with them preventing President Bush
to send immediate help after the disaster, and not heeding his and the
Weather Service warning them of imminent disaster,
and from them not following the cities own evacuation plans.
All of these problems
created by the Democrats of Louisiana
combined to create the perfect storm of Socialist
disaster that New Orleans
While the left
wing media such as CNN ("The
Communist News Network" AKA known as "The Clinton News Network")
showed all of the poor people stranded on rooftops, and starving at the
Superdome and blaming President Bush
for not caring, they conveniently forgot to tell the truth about the situation
such as the Mayor
ignoring the cities evacuation plans, the Governor
refusing federal and Red Cross
Instead the media
showed the now known to be made up stories about murders and rapes at the
and didn't mention that the President's
help was RIGHT THERE
but that he was prevented by FEDERAL LAW
from sending troops in UNTIL the
that the President
should be impeached, but you didn't mention that an impeachable offense
by him would have been to violate the Posse
While your ignorant
buddy Kanye West
declared that "George Bush doesn't care about
black people", it seems like he, the media,
and you, were unaware of the law.
be honest Bruce,
and tell the TRUTH
It wasn't President
Bush who stopped the levee's from being built,
nor was it he who prevented the city from being evacuated, nor was it he
who refused help to arrive to the flooded city, nor was it he who misspent
the billions of dollars of aid that went to the city after the natural
He also didn't
cause the disaster by not signing the Kyoto
Treaty as Robert
Kennedy Jr. ridiculously claimed.
it was your Democratic Socialistic
friends who neglected New Orleans. You can spin
it any way you want, just like the leftist media did, but that doesn't
change the facts of what REALLY
Isn't it just
amazing that all the Liberal Idiots
who criticized our government for not helping the people in New
Orleans want to put the government in charge
of our health care!
That right there
is the main problem with Democratic Liberalism,
it's simply never consistent, and by the way, it never works to fix problems
"Division of Wealth"
his Liberal Democratic
friends keep crying about the "Division of
Wealth" and the lack of health care in America
like we're all living the the The Great Depression.
Nothing could be further from the truth as America
is living in the greatest period of prosperity in the history of the planet.
What the heck
is the "Division of Wealth" Bruce?
You make it sound like there was this big pile of money and most of it
to a select few people and withheld from the rest.
I have news for
Most of the wealth in the country was created from the hard work by the
people who EARNED it,
and, by the way, paid ENORMOUS
taxes on it, it was not given
to them. Except, of course,
those overpaid idiots like actors and rock stars:)
People start businesses,
and work extremely hard to make money. America
has the highest standard of living in the entire world. Even our poor people
are considered wealthy compared to over 50% of the world. Our wages
are higher, our unemployment lower than all other countries.
So I guess you
want a more equitable division of the wealth? That's code for taking
it from the rich and giving it to the poor. Which is, of course, SOCIALISM!
Do you need another
lesson in economics Bruce?
It's the wealthy who support most of the tax burden in America.
If you want to know just how effective
the mainstream media is, it is amazing how many people that fall into the
categories below think President Bush is screwing
them and Bill Clinton was the greatest President
ever. If ANY Democrat is elected, ALL
of them say they will repeal the Bush tax
cuts and a good portion of the people that fall into the categories above
can't wait for it to happen. Notice that those making $30,000 had
thier taxes almost CUT IN HALF by President
Bush! That's what the Democrats
call "Tax cuts for the
Presidential candidate, the ambulance chasing attorney, and New
Orleans mortgage forecloser (Oops!), John
Edwards claims that 37 million Americans currently
"struggle with incredible poverty."
However, an examination
of the living standards of the 37 million persons performed by the US Census
Bureau, whom the government defines as "poor,"
that what Edwards calls "the
plague" of American poverty might not be as
as candidate Edwards contends.
of all poor households actually own their own homes. The average home owned
by persons classified as poor by the Census Bureau is a three bedroom house
with one-and-a-half baths, a garage, and a porch or patio.
Eighty percent of
poor households have air conditioning. By contrast, in 1970, only 36 percent
of the entire U.S. population enjoyed air conditioning.
Only 6 percent of
poor households are overcrowded. More than two-thirds have more than two
rooms per person.
The average poor
American has more living space than the average individual living in Paris,
London, Vienna, Athens, and other cities throughout Europe. (These comparisons
are to the average citizens in foreign countries, not to those classified
of poor households own a car; 31 percent own two or more cars.
of poor households have a color television; over half own two or more color
have a VCR or DVD player; 62 percent have cable or satellite TV reception.
own microwave ovens, more than half have a stereo, and more than a third
have an automatic dishwasher.
Here is a "poor"
woman living in government paid public housing. She says "I
might be poor but I don't like to live poor. I thank God for a place to
live but it's pitiful what people give you."
This woman gets government assistance, free government housing, free medical
care, and do you also notice that she also owns a 60
inch widescreen high definition PLASMA TV!!!
woman, Sharon Jasper,
also said "I'm tired of the slum landlords,
and I'm tired of the slum houses".
Slum! with hardwood
floors and a microwave
is well known in New Orleans for
being an advocate of the "working poor". Even though she
says she cannot work she certainly has a lot of time to attend protests.
The fact is that
Jasper admits that she has been on public
assistance for 57 out of the 58 years of her
ENTIRE life! (Story HERE)
"Working" poor? I think not.
She says that
the government has turned her into a "slave".
She claims that
the "white man",
as she refers to the city council as, is forcing her to live in "inhuman
conditions", a slum (with her big screen TV).
Here is a video
of her at a city council meeting screaming a racist rant to another member
of the audience to "Shut Up White Boy".
Very, very nice.
Sharon Jasper screaming at
the "white man".
says that she is "trapped"
in a "slum" because
in order for her to move into another apartment she needs a security deposit
which she cannot afford. So she expects for you and I to pay that
deposit along with everything else we have given her.
This woman gets
a government a voucher to choose wherever she wants to live. She
also gets a public assistance check, and with that check she has CHOSEN
buy a Plasma TV.
Meanwhile she describes what the rest of us who pay taxes have given her
Being very grateful
for her government assistance, you can see that she has on a T-Shirt that
says President Bush
and Conde Lisa Rice
are "WANTED FOR MASS MURDER".
haven't turned you into a slave. YOU
have made yourself a "slave" by never CHOOSING
to get out of your situation or improve your situation in life.
have helped you with a free education, money, medical care, and housing
your ENTIRE LIFE!
tax dollars go to YOU
scot free but YOU
have NEVER paid
a PENNY in taxes! "Working poor"
my ass! Apparently YOU'VE never
worked a DAY in
your life! The fact is since
you've been given EVERYTHING
for free your ENTIRE
life that it has made you unappreciative and left you with a feeling of
You're so full
of hatred all you can do is blame the "white
man". And you have the gall to call what we
taxpayers have given you, which is to fulfill all of your financial needs
your ENTIRE LIFE,
I find it interesting
that you have the strength to go protest but can't seem to find the resolve
to get yourself a job and get yourself out of your SELF
you RACIST, that's
our responsibility, it's YOURS! Why don't you
& your welfare daughter go home and "SHUT
UP" and watch your widescreen TV!
INGRATE! "SHUT UP WHITE
BOY, SHUT UP WHITE BOY, SHUT UP WHITE BOY!!!"
This is the product
of Liberal Democratic
welfare and public assistance programs that doesn't really help people,
it turns them into government slaves who get everything for free without
having to work. These are the
people that John Edwards, Barrack Obama, Hillary
Clinton, and Bruce Springsteen say that we
report on poverty mentioned above also stated that a great number of people
without health care in the United States
own their own homes, own cars and trucks, own TV's and DVD players, and
have cell phones.
As far as health
care goes most of the people in America
have it and EVERY ONE
of them pays for it themselves either directly, or through the jobs they
hold in which it is another form of income for them.
So for those who
don't have more wealth or health care a lot of the blame rests upon themselves
for not educating themselves better (through taxpayer paid education plans),
not searching for better jobs, and for those who refuse to pay for health
Life is all about
choices, and in America
we have more choices than anywhere else in the world. If you choose
not to pay for health care and buy luxury items, that's YOUR
choice and I as a taxpayer feel no obligation to help you.
get health care if you want it. You CAN
get a better job if you want one. You CAN
succeed if you want to in America.
Springsteen and his Democratic
friends seem to believe this statement:
each according to their ability, to
each according to their need."
That's a very
nice statement that Liberals
claim to show their compassion for others.
problem is that statement was made by the father of modern Socialism
and Communism: KARL
MARX, the Father of FAILURE!
Obama in his dreamland - Communist
Springsteen has formally endorsed Barrack
Obama as candidate for President
The Presidential election
of 2008 will be a very important one for America.
Obama is unfit to be our president.
has NO experience and his best gift is making
speeches that say nothing. He's an empty suit.
is a MARXIST want to turn a Free
America into a Socialist nation.
One item that I would
like to post right now is a shameful picture of Barack
Obama's campaign headquarters in Houston Texas where a flag of the
murderer, Che Guevara is proudly posted
on the wall. Disgusting!
refuses to wear an American flag pin. Disgraceful.
Here to see the video of Che Guevara's
flag at Obama's campaign office!
Obama won't hold his hand over his heart when the National
Anthem is played. A video verifies the
picture is real HERE.
people are asking me why I hate Bruce Springsteen
To the contrary,
I don't hate Bruce in
the least. He's a great artist and I love his music very much. Although it is
a bit hard for me to listen to it today when I think of the stupid, lying
things he's said. I don't hate
but I do hate the lies that he's told.
talks a lot about redemption. So my hope for him is that he can find
some redemption for himself. I hope that one day soon he will be
a man and say "I've said some stupid things
in the past that turned out not to be true about President Bush and I'm
very sorry for having done so".
That's all it
will take for me to forgive Bruce
for bearing false witness against his brother.
I'm not going to hold my breath waiting for his apology.
A few years ago,
before the 2004 Presidential election, Bruce
Springsteen made some very unsettling political
comments. Because of his outright political lies (not opinions) I
wrote a web page about him:
have a DUTY to
educate your children to the history of our country. They
most certainly aren't going to get this education in our public liberal
believe what anyone tells you, educate yourselves. Listen
to both sides of the issues. Get the real facts.
works EVERY time
it's tried and Liberalism
fails every time it's tried. Conservatism
equates to more government CONTROL
over our lives and the loss of personal freedoms.
to the Democrats
and the garbage that they spew. Like me one day you'll wake up and realize
they make no sense. They are wrong on economics, wrong on foreign policy,
wrong on just about every issue facing America today.
when you're ready get the REAL
facts from the really educated people.
are some sources for the truth.
if you don't agree with what they are saying, at least have an open mind
and keep listening and eventually you'll find out what they are saying
you'll ever get to the truth is to listen to both sides of the issues.
The Twin Towers of
the World Trade Center!
want the Twin Towers rebuilt!
The new Freedom
Tower on the site of the World Trade Center
has begun construction.
It's a disgrace.
It's time that this bad Idea be dropped.
The truth is that
most Americans simply do not like the design.
There's a better
design which most people prefer than the junkyard that is being constructed
now. It's what many of us have wanted since that terrible morning
of 9/11. It is to rebuild
the Twin Towers one story higher than they were.
Rebuild them stronger,
better, and one floor higher!
This will RESTORE
the New York skyline to it's previous beauty.
It will also show
the terrorists that they cannot alter our country for long.
I believe we MUST
rebuild the towers to show the world that we have won.